Thirteen years and a long cashier
Cloudbet: forty coins, and a clause buried in the eighteenth section
Cloudbet has been running since 2013, the earliest launch year among these 10, and its cashier takes 40 coins, three of them pegged to the dollar. The clause on documents is numbered 18.1.1, which puts it in the eighteenth section of the terms, and that number says as much about the document as forty says about the cashier.
Thirteen years, and what follows from them
The service has been running since 2013. That is the earliest date in our ten: the next is 2015, then twice 2022 and once 2023, while for the remaining brands we could read no launch year at all.
A long run is a fact rather than a document.
Keeping the two apart is worth doing, because descriptions of crypto casinos usually place them side by side as one argument. A launch year says a service survived on this market for over a decade. It does not say at what amount documents will be demanded, how long a payout takes, or whether a register entry is still valid, because those answers live elsewhere and carry their own numbers.
Across the hundred-brand set, five brands hold an entry marked revoked while continuing to trade and looking exactly as they did before. What disappears and what stays after a permission is withdrawn is shown on the page about operator documents.
Clause 18.1.1, and the depth of a document
We read the identity clause at 18.1.1. It names no amount. The anti-money-laundering policy alongside it requires independent identity documents, and the operator reserves the right to verify any customer it considers a risk and to demand fresh documents from someone verified once already.
The number itself carries information here.
An eighteenth section with a second-level sub-point is a long contract, minutely divided, written by somebody who writes such documents for a living. That can be a merit, because a detailed document leaves less to be assumed. It is also a cost, because the clause that decides a payout then sits far from the place a player looks for it, and a player looks in the section on withdrawals.
Re-verification after an earlier verification is worth noticing separately. It means one complete set of documents does not settle the matter permanently.
Eight operators of our ten write about their own judgement in this clause; two name an amount with a clause number beside it. The figures that circulate for this brand in other people’s comparisons carry no clause number, so we do not repeat them. All ten clauses, with their numbers wherever we could read one, stand side by side on the page about casinos without identity checks.
The company, the entry and an archived copy
The operator is Halcyon Super Holdings B.V., and the number reads OGL/2024/328/0599, from the Curaçao Gaming Authority register. Our record shows it as active.
We read the terms from an archived copy rather than from the operator’s own site.
That has a consequence we would rather write out than leave implied. A copy records what the document said on the day it was taken, and the operator may have changed the wording since, with no duty to warn anyone. Across the whole set of a hundred brands we read 37 sets of terms directly from the operator’s site, 41 from a copy, and 22 we could not reach at all. The rules are set out on the page about how we read documents.
The number is also stamped 2024 against a service trading since 2013.
That eleven-year gap is the widest in this table and makes the point better than any other row: the year inside a licence number dates a register entry, not a business. Anyone reading “a 2024 licence” as a sign of a new operator has misread the format rather than the operator.
Forty coins, and three of them are stablecoins
The cashier takes 40 coins, headed by bitcoin, bitcoin cash, ether and three coins pegged to the dollar: tether, USD coin and Pax dollar.
That is the longest list of coin names we managed to read anywhere in our set of a hundred brands, where the four behind it run to 19, 15, 15 and 13 entries.
Forty is therefore an outlier rather than an industry norm, though advertising copy tends to present it as the standard.
One figure in this table is larger, the ninety at this site’s advertising partner, and it is a different kind of figure: ninety is a total that operator states about itself, while forty is the length of a list we counted name by name. Setting one above the other would mean ranking a claim against a reading. The difference between a forty-entry list and a ten-entry one is the tail — the rarer coins — rather than what most people actually pay with: the four headline coins are taken almost everywhere in this table. Three dollar-pegged coins in one cashier do have a practical use, letting a balance sit out of the way of exchange-rate movement while a payout is pending. What this column says about money in an account, and what it does not, is unpacked on the page about casinos that take cryptocurrency.
A game count and a supplier count stand in our record here too, and neither is printed, because neither is a document.
Two different refusals, and only one of them is Polish
The sources for this entry include the operator’s terms and a separate page listing the countries whose players it refuses. We read that list on 26 August 2026 and Poland is not on it.
A register works by instruction to companies; an exclusion list works by decision of the operator.
The first binds internet providers and payment providers, and its basis is art. 15f of the Gambling Act. The second hangs in the terms, surfaces at the first payout, and no Polish body will change it, because an operator with no Polish permit falls under no Polish supervision. How the first mechanism works, and how to search a domain in it, is described on the page about the register of banned domains.
What follows in Poland
Thirteen years of trading create no Polish permit, and forty coins in a cashier create even less. Internet casino games here are covered by a state monopoly and no private permit exists in that category. Where the single figure comes from is unpacked on the page about the lawful online casino.
On the player’s side stands art. 107 § 2 of the Fiscal Penal Code, with art. 109 beside it. Both wordings are on the page about what the statute says.
We hold no account with this operator, deposited nothing there, and write about no payout from experience.